Candidates respond to Air Quality Questionnaire
Breathe Clean Air sent a questionnaire on air quality to candidates in Comox Valley's 2026 local government elections. Most candidates responded in full or in part. Their responses are below.
Our goal was to learn where candidates stood on different aspects of the issue and about their commitment to continued action to reduce wood smoke.
Please read our news release for more background and perspectives from 2 of our volunteers.
Yes or No
For all five questions (see below), a "yes" answer reflects closer agreement with Breathe Clean Air's positions and our understanding of what is needed to make a real difference in our air quality.
A "no" indicates a difference of opinion from the candidate.
Comments were also allowed for each question so the candidate could further explain their position.
Raise your concerns
As candidates knock on your door, or talk at forums, continue to bring up air quality. Share your personal stories about how our poor air quality impacts you or your family, or ask them to clarify their positions on this important topic. Change happens when people speak up.
Please vote for action on air quality!
THE RESPONSES
Click on an area to view the questions and candidate responses (Opens a PDF in new tab)
THE QUESTIONS
Question 1
Every winter, the Comox Valley experiences poor air quality due to high levels of harmful fine particulate matter. We experience air quality advisories and frequently break BC Air Quality Objectives. We are one of the worst communities of 13 monitored in the Georgia Strait Air Zone.
In the Comox Valley, we know wood smoke is the source of most of our fine particulates (or “PM2.5”). Everyone’s health can be impacted by poor air quality, particularly children, seniors, and people with pre-existing conditions. Studies show these particulates increase the risk of heart attacks and strokes, increase the rate of respiratory infections and lung cancer, impact lung development in infants and children, and much more (see Doctors & Scientists Against Wood Smoke Pollution).
Are you concerned about wood smoke in the Comox Valley and how it is affecting people’s health?
Question 2
The development of the Comox Valley Airshed Roundtable Action Plan involved local governments, health authorities, industry groups, environmental non-profits, and community members. The plan's goals included a reduction of emissions from existing wood-burning appliances, a reduction of existing wood-burning appliances, a transition away from wood-burning appliances in densely populated areas, along with a reduction of yard waste burning, promotion of alternatives, and expanded research data on particulate mater.
If elected, will you work toward fulfilling the 2023 Comox Valley Airshed Roundtable Action
Plan?
Question 3
To help ensure the wood smoke problem did not get any worse, all three municipalities passed bylaws in the last few years to prevent wood stoves from being installed in new construction. In Comox and Courtenay, the bylaws also said homes that did not already have a wood burning appliance were not allowed to install one after the bylaws were passed.
These bylaws effectively capped the number of wood stoves in these three municipalities, helping to ensure the problem would not get any worse. It also protected people who intentionally moved to cleaner areas from having a wood stove pop up next door
Will you strengthen and build on your municipality's no-new-installation bylaws
to prevent the increase in the number of wood burning appliances?
Question 4
Our summers are increasingly vulnerable to wildfire smoke. The danger to property and the potential for lost lives is real. While our ability to reduce wildfires in the summer is bound up with much larger climate change issue, our ability to reduce the same kind of smoke hazard in the winter is within our reach.
If elected, what will you do to reduce winter wood smoke pollution in the Comox Valley?
Question 5
Burning of yard waste, including leaves and branches, is regulated by local governments.
These yard waste fires create a lot of harmful localized smoke, impacting neighbours’ use and enjoyment of their own property as well as their health.
Although yard waste fires have been banned in Comox, Courtenay, and Cumberland, they are allowed in the rest of the CVRD and are impacting both neighbours and neighbouring communities. (BC regulates larger open burns and agricultural waste fires and these are not the focus of this question).
In 2021, the CVRD convened the multi-stakeholder Airshed Roundtable to develop and implement a Regional Airshed Protection Strategy to guide air quality actions. To help protect public health, one of the main actions includes eliminating yard waste burning.
Do you support the elimination of yard waste burning in the CVRD?